Danbooru

Bangs?

Posted under General

I don't understand blunt_bangs into hime_cut, since not every character with a hime_cut has blunt bangs. And some artist don't draw cut bangs with a hime cut.

That doesn't make sense. The hime cut pretty much means "horizontally cut bangs, sidelocks cut at the jawline, long hair in the back".

Good point, though I hesitate to call Kannabi-no-Mikoto's hair a hime cut, save in a few depictions.

Sorry to bother you, jxh2154, but I seem to have been hasty in recommending the implication. Would you mind undoing it?

jjj14 said:

I had never heard the term "blunt bangs" before this. Maybe it's some hairstylist jargon?

I'm sure I can't answer that, but hairstylist terminology is what I went hunting for to Wikipedia. Sort of figured that would be needed to describe what we are after. :)

Well, undone I guess. I also thought blunt_bangs were a prerequisite for a hime_cut (only time I've ever used it), but I guess not.

But all I can do is remove the implication and then mass edit blunt_bangs off every hime_cut. So it'll need to be manually re-added where it was appropriate. Unless someone has a better idea.

I was under the same impression, and thought the "fringe hime cut" references in the hime_cut wiki were a bit iffy. If the style is actually anachronistic in that aspect though and we want to use hime_cut for both historic and modern versions of the hairstyle, the implication doesn't work, I guess.

Maybe it'd be better to manually remove blunt_bangs where it doesn't apply? I'd guess that most of hime_cut still applies to the tag.

Sorry, I was using the American term for fringe, meaning edge ends of *anything. Not the British term meaning bangs. I just figured you would put blunt_bangs as in actual bangs that were cut straight even across. And put that in the bangs tag.

Which is why I suggested blunt-cut_bangs in order to describe bangs that were cut, instead of hanging uneven on the forehead.

Hmm, that makes sense. I guess the potential synonymy threw me. Basically then you were explicitly calling the examples I was referring to as "iffy" "iffy" by calling them "fringe", which is exactly what I meant.

In any case if we want to consider them hime_cut (and it seems we should since they still have the chin-length sidelocks) the implication still breaks.

  • 1
  • 2