Implicating against_tree -> tree

Funny enough, against_tree -tree manages to reach 2 pages of results.

The same goes for

• palm_tree
• christmas_tree
• tree_sitting

I think it's pretty trivial that those should be implicated to tree also.

Did all but christmas_tree. As for that one, how are we handling more abstract trees like post #444369?

I'd say that, like jack-o-lantern, it's more symbolism than an actual object now, given its history. You could just manually add tree when you see it.

Requesting sitting_in_tree -> tree implication as well.

Cyberia-Mix said:
Requesting sitting_in_tree -> tree implication as well.

Done.