Aliasing resizing_artifacts -> resampling_artifacts.

Reason: Tags mean the same thing.

Although I don't really like this one; post #120254 is downscaled, post #470314 is upscaled, and post #114534 is just sort of blurry (or are those scan_artifacts?), and they all look totally different. I guess nobody cares though.

Bump.

There's also an upscale tag. Since you can only recognize an upscale from the resampling artifacts, it should probably be an implication if not an outright alias.

Alias in which direction?

It might be better to just change the tag to "resized". I don't think we want even well-done resized images, and nobody is using danbooru as a way to research different kinds of artifacts.

Hmm, the tag is still pretty poor quality. post #409472 has no artifacts I see (just… someone's mouse cursor) and post #109425 is regular JPEG compression, plus maybe scanning bleed-through.

memento_mori said:
post #409472 has no artifacts I see (just… someone's mouse cursor) and post #109425 is regular JPEG compression, plus maybe scanning bleed-through.

Look closely, there's a grid of blotchy squares across each image. Bad resampling.

Another example: post #54261 vs. post #380912

Where do you get a resizer that adds blotching to flat-colored areas?

Paint or an ancient copy of ACDSee maybe?

resizing_ makes sense to me then, and is artifacts fine? Or is there a more general word?

Otherwise I'll alias to resizing_artifacts

I can't think of a better word than artifacts, if you need a word there.

Possibly just resized might work as well.

piespy said: Possibly just resized might work as well.

Hm, maybe, and specified to resized_image but a resizing won't always create artifacts. Well, not necessarily noticeable ones.

Aliasing to resizing_artifacts for now.