Posted under General
The pool #2194 ("GARthering") contains some images where a bunch of manly men are together, doing amazing things:
But, in most images there, manly men simply are together, doing nothing:
So, perhaps the description of the pool should be changed, to be more inclusive, to allow all of these images.
Updated by Lunatic6
I edited the pool as expected. I removed the last four words of the old description:
"Where the most GAR people gather and do amazing things."
Well I was thinking of changing the name itself, just to let badass female gatherings would be included in the pool without any further questions.
But yet it seems GARthering fits the pool well so maybe I leave it be...
"FEMazing", perhaps?
You have to change the pool name if you're going to include females. A pool whose name depends on a term that is essentially "really really manly" doesn't make any sense to include females.
I'd made a second pool. GAR sort of has to be male by definition it's not entirely synonymous with bad-ass.
Then what are we going to do with these posts?
post #39486
post #697247
post #923374
post #921215
post #903293
post #187654
post #900830
post #814550
And especially this one:
Right, maybe a renaming would do, just to let these posts be included.
I was thinking of "Epic Gatherings" or something but it would be great for any suggestions.
Lunatic6 said:
Then what are we going to do with these posts?post #39486
post #697247
post #923374
post #921215
post #903293
post #187654
post #900830
post #814550And especially this one:
Right, maybe a renaming would do, just to let these posts be included.
I was thinking of "Epic Gatherings" or something but it would be great for any suggestions.
It seems to be good as it is. There's no real problem. GARthering has a very nice sound to it as well, so a change in naming would be. . . not good.
But if I won't do something, pointless arguments about gender, powerlevel discussions or worst could suddenly appear out of nowhere... I'm not trying to be sexist but I'm rather playing it safe.
And beside I think in post #953489 someone I think is already raging.
Lunatic6 said:
But if I won't do something, pointless arguments about gender, powerlevel discussions or worst could suddenly appear out of nowhere... I'm not trying to be sexist but I'm rather playing it safe.And beside I think in post #953489 someone I think is already raging.
I took a look at it, but the person looks like they're not raging about the pool. So the pool is still safe!
But it looks like your comment and mine and others' were downvoted for no clear reason. Mysterious mysterious. (Annoying, it's as if someone is actively downvoting me)
Updated
Keep GARthering for males. Don't we have a couple other pools for characters just generally being badass though?
jxh2154 said:
Keep GARthering for males. Don't we have a couple other pools for characters just generally being badass though?
But girls can be GAR as well.
GARgirls...
Well as jxh's orders, GARthering will be males.
But don't worry, I won't touch the first eight posts that mentioned because I can see manliness is still dominates those posts, I'm not sure about post #953489 though.
Also, I have a last question, does Mecha can qualify to this pool as well, I mean post #946451 and post #997841 are surely all mecha.
I'm also preventing this GARthering = Manly + Everyone or Crossover to happen.
Black_Gold_Saw said:
But girls can be GAR as well.GARgirls...
Don't worry I understand about this thing, females with male dominant traits or females with manly achievements that they have achieve in canon (post #903293) can qualify in this pool.
