Implicate: armored_dress -> dress
Implicate: chinese_dress -> dress
Implicate: impossible_dress -> dress
Implicate: striped_dress -> dress

Reason: Types of dresses. Some are tagged with both, some aren't.

RaisingK said:
armored_dress -> dress

-1.
From armored dress wiki:

A character is wearing either a dress or skirt adorned with combat armor.

I imagine you meant china_dress -> dress, and not chinese_clothes -> dress. The images under china_dress though seem rather different than what you'd find under the dress tag.

Yeah, I would leave dress for more prototypical dresses.

NWF_Renim said:
The images under china_dress though seem rather different than what you'd find under the dress tag.

Then would you have dress be removed from the posts tagged with both of those? Excluding those with one of each, of course.

I would probably recommend we have the dress tag removed from the images that are just the Chinese dress.

As a side note: the tag we currently use is "China_Dress" with the following aliased to it: chinadress, qipao, cheongsam, chinese_dress.

I did the two that haven't been challenged:
create implication impossible_dress -> dress
create implication striped_dress -> dress

jxh2154 said:
create implication impossible_dress -> dress

That leaves us with 2 pages of impossible_dress china_dress.
I see why one would want to separate dress from china_dress, but I would still want to use a single impossible* tag for all "dresses" (=one-pieces) instead of creating an impossible_china_dress tag or impossible_vietnamese_dress.