lkjh098 said:
That's why I suggested gag_removed, which could be used to find a gag not being used just like thighhighs_removed can be used to find thighhighs not being worn. So yes.
To me that seems to be the same as proposing for a dildo or vibrator in an image not being used in the image should be tagged dildo/vibrator_removed. The idea of non-normal stuff having the default implication that it is worn/used seems somewhat awkward, even if the bulk of the images do depict it in a used state.
Also how would this tag relate to the ungagged tag?
I still think the the current intended definitions previously agreed here is the better approach, since it not only is simpler, it also covers all the bases. It'd probaly be easier to rename the gag tag to reduce confusion and use the current definitions than add additional tags to compensate for what in theory could already be done with the intended current setup.