When his name, likeness, and creations are no longer defended by a corporate legal juggernaut the likes of which the world has never known.
> Implying that Fate gives a shit about the actual appearances or works of the people whose names they use.
Considering as, say, they introduced Thomas Edison as a lion-head, or J Edgar Hoover (virulent racist) as a dark-skinned girl in lingerie without actually hinting at who the character was supposed to be based upon for years, they could probably get by making a "Walt-oneesan" so long as they always keep the label as something vague like "Rider of Black-and-White-Film"
> Implying that Fate gives a shit about the actual appearances or works of the people whose names they use.
Considering as, say, they introduced Thomas Edison as a lion-head, or J Edgar Hoover (virulent racist) as a dark-skinned girl in lingerie without actually hinting at who the character was supposed to be based upon for years, they could probably get by making a "Walt-oneesan" so long as they always keep the label as something vague like "Rider of Black-and-White-Film"
>implying that Disney isn't beyond suing the shit out of anyone for any perceived slight or potentially-lost royalties
It's sort of like all those animes that have "WcDonalds" - it's just a matter of how much you need to blur some of the details to be technically legally distinct.
It's sort of like all those animes that have "WcDonalds" - it's just a matter of how much you need to blur some of the details to be technically legally distinct.
Wasn't she supposed to be a Japanese assassin from world war 2? I remember there being a shitstorm over it.
Wasn't she supposed to be a Japanese assassin from world war 2? I remember there being a shitstorm over it.
I remember seeing fanart about that idea that then got taken down due to backlash, but it wasn't official. Still, I'm surprised that Babydoll = Hoover got confirmed. I remember that being one of the two major theories, but still...