to be perfectly frank, whats wrong if he had said the other? if thats his preference that doesn't make him crazy... whether he's gay, bisexual, or simply into femdom/futa whatever its still pretty rational however you look at it
NarakuniYokoso said: to be perfectly frank, whats wrong if he had said the other? if thats his preference that doesn't make him crazy... whether he's gay, bisexual, or simply into femdom/futa whatever its still pretty rational however you look at it
Well said. I'm glad not everyone are closed-minded and ignorant. Amazing that we live in the 21st century, yet some people are still centuries behind.
Bootyful_Doll said: Well said. I'm glad not everyone are closed-minded and ignorant. Amazing that we live in the 21st century, yet some people are still centuries behind.
not true no one is open-minded. people who claim to be open-minded are always close-minded to whoever they consider close-minded. to be truly open-minded you must accept all opinions no matter how hate filled or how much you disagree.
ramis said: not true no one is open-minded. people who claim to be open-minded are always close-minded to whoever they consider close-minded. to be truly open-minded you must accept all opinions no matter how hate filled or how much you disagree.
Then again, why does one consider open and closed-mindedness as black and white? One doesn't need to be completely/100% open-minded or closed minded. There can be a degree of in between. Compare it to how much you open a door.
ramis said: not true no one is open-minded. people who claim... blah blah blah
You could use a course in philosophy. An open-minded person may reject the opinions of a closed-minded person and still remain open-minded. Why? Because he rejects the arguments of the closed-minded person. It's not that he claims to know everything, but rather, an open-minded person has analyzed his own beliefs quite well using cold logic and has likely found logical fallacies in the arguments of the closed-minded. When they find and use rational arguments, his mind may change.
BakaHoushi said: You could use a course in philosophy. An open-minded person may reject the opinions of a closed-minded person and still remain open-minded. Why? Because he rejects the arguments of the closed-minded person. It's not that he claims to know everything, but rather, an open-minded person has analyzed his own beliefs quite well using cold logic and has likely found logical fallacies in the arguments of the closed-minded. When they find and use rational arguments, his mind may change.
just because my opinion is different then yours doesn't mean i haven't thought about it. as for logic, that doesn't have too much of a place in this. it's either every one should do whatever or there is a set code for conduct. it's just a matter of what they believe. i'm sure you would hate a world where there is no freedom just as i would hate a would with too much freedom. also, i'm not completely closed-minded, i only hate homos, sissy men, and manly women. all there is to it is that you disagree with me and i disagree with you.
It's entirely possible for two open-minded people, using logic, to disagree. Though suggesting the people you listed are inferior, as you may be doing with the word "hate," is clearly NOT thinking at all.
Posting without bumping because "lol, philosophy debate on the Internet"