Right... I'm probably going to take flak for this, but I'm reverting the loli tag on the Satori images I uploaded. I wouldn't have cared as much up until I saw that this of all images got tagged with it.
Still not seeing it. The words at hand were "sexually charged enough to warrant being questionable", and I don't view panties as being sexually charged. I put it as being questionable because it isn't a purely SFW image.
Right. I'm going to bed and removing the tag yet again (for the reasoning stated below). If a mod can shed some light on why this should be tagged loli, I'll gladly withdraw my complaints.
DschingisKhan said: She doesn't really look that young here. Flat-chested, yes, but not like a child.
This. While I use loli as an umbrella term for neotonous girls, the ruling provided states that the loli tag applies to sexual images of children. Satori is not portrayed as a child in this image. Unless the loli tag is applied to every girl who is short and flatchested (Australiabooru, anyone?), then it shouldn't apply in this case.