NeverGonnaGive about 10 years ago ...except "Blue" was never actually playable? I don't think an illustration of a hypothetical really counts.
lxs about 10 years ago T5J8F8 said:...except "Blue" was never actually playable? I don't think an illustration of a hypothetical really counts.Yeah, wasn't really sure what to tag her with. Was going to go with lass_(pokemon) but that's not exactly right either...
NeverGonnaGive about 10 years ago lxs said:Yeah, wasn't really sure what to tag her with. Was going to go with lass_(pokemon) but that's not exactly right either...Eh, "Blue"'s fine; prolly what she'd've been called anyway, and I don't think anyone wants to make a one- or two-post female_protagonist_(pokemon_rgby) tag (and accompanying female_protagonist_(pokemon_rby) alias).
BoboTheClown about 10 years ago Why is it always the Emerald costume? The earlier Ruby/Sapphire one was better. :<
Xephina about 10 years ago T5J8F8 said:...except "Blue" was never actually playable? I don't think an illustration of a hypothetical really counts.>See Female Main Character. >http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Unreleased_Pok%C3%A9mon_and_characters
NeverGonnaGive about 10 years ago Xephina said:>See Female Main Character.Wwwhich is what I was 'talking' about? As in, Nintendo/Game Freak's illustration(s).
Venagade about 10 years ago So what? The artist just wanted to have a female for all the gens in a picture. Why is that so hard for people to grasp. :/
Maguitus almost 10 years ago Venagade said:So what? The artist just wanted to have a female for all the gens in a picture. Why is that so hard for people to grasp. :/YOU CANNOT GRASP THE TRUE FORM OF..oh whatever
Venagade almost 10 years ago T5J8F8 said:So... Boy version? (with Nu Red, thank you very much)Well a boy version would have both forms of Red.