Posted under General
iridescent_slime said:
The various elements here (string bikini, spread legs, groping hands) could all be Safe when taken individually but in combination they make the image as a whole seem a bit sexually charged. Is this enough to push it into Questionable? If so, is it loli?
Yes and yes imo.
kittey said:
post #3178701: Is that cameltoe really safe?
post #3159647, post #3159650: Does that count as non-blatantly exposed genitals?
1:Q
2:Borderline but E. 3:E That is very blatant imo.
post #63420 Does the text still make it questionable?
No. The rating system is based on drawn visuals.
I'm confused why this was changed to q.
Probably the barely visible cameltoe. Changing it to Safe.
The same user has changed this to q two times but I can't see anything that would make it non-safe, it's not a revealing downblouse or anything.
Unbreakable said:
The same user has changed this to q two times but I can't see anything that would make it non-safe, it's not a revealing downblouse or anything.
It seems that that same user has been going on a tagging spree over the last few days, changing Safe posts to Questionable and Questionable posts to Explicit for no apparent reason. Most of these edits seem highly suspect.
@Whaters Knock it off already. You need to refrain from making any further tag edits until you've read howto:rate.
iridescent_slime said:
It seems that that same user has been going on a tagging spree over the last few days, changing Safe posts to Questionable and Questionable posts to Explicit for no apparent reason. Most of these edits seem highly suspect.
@Whaters Knock it off already. You need to refrain from making any further tag edits until you've read howto:rate.
Most of their Q->E changes were obviously wrong, so I undid those. Some of their S->Q changes were slightly more gray area, so I left most of those in place for now.
Additional note to Whaters: Sexual/romantic encounters involving futanari never count as yuri.
post #2881047
Is there enough cameltoe for a Q rating?
ion288 said:
post #2881047
Is there enough cameltoe for a Q rating?
IMO yes.
---
post #3220264 - Panty pull on bed should be Q?
kittey said:
IMO yes.
---
post #3220264 - Panty pull on bed should be Q?
I think so.
post #3178192 (also loli check if Q)
It's safe.
For post #3237059 I'm hovering between the current q, or e,
for the visible, yet uncolored and with no drawn features other than the outline, male penis.
plus the scenario implies imminent sex.
keonas said:
For post #3237059 I'm hovering between the current q, or e,
for the visible, yet uncolored and with no drawn features other than the outline, male penis.
plus the scenario implies imminent sex.
It's a penis so it should be e.
post #3268046 was changed twice (by the same user) to Questionable but I don't see anything that would make it non-safe.
Unbreakable said:
post #3268046 was changed twice (by the same user) to Questionable but I don't see anything that would make it non-safe.
Wedgies are Q material.
feline_lump said:
Wedgies are Q material.
That's a wedgie? Even if it is I don't really see how it makes it Q...
Unbreakable said:
That's a wedgie? Even if it is I don't really see how it makes it Q...
It's on howto:rate. Besides that, the naughty face and detailed ass and panties make the intent obvious.
Just wanna check if they really qualify for a q rating (and the loli tag)
