Can someone make a wiki page for color_trace ? Is that even a real term?
Posted under General
Can someone make a wiki page for color_trace ? Is that even a real term?
I'm thinking about how to tag canonically non-zombie characters who are depicted as zombies. Would that fall under monsterification, or should a separate zombification tag be made?
Is humanoid_robot the same as android?
yelite said:
Is humanoid_robot the same as android?
Not according to the robot wiki.
yelite said:
Is humanoid_robot the same as android?
Is male hand the same as pov_hands 1boy head_out_of_frame?
忍猫 said:
Is male hand the same as pov_hands 1boy head_out_of_frame?
Isn't it more 1boy out_out_frame? I don't see how the tag is useful.
Raised fist is a pretty established pose, but should raised fists be separate or under the same tag? A lot of posts look like something like clenched_hands hands_up.
Unbreakable said:
Isn't it more 1boy out_out_frame? I don't see how the tag is useful.
Most images by default have a male hand with the body out of frame, female hand would be a more useful tag if it were a thing.
Are posts tagged with unamused either annoyed, expressionless, or pool #1632?
Is there a reason that the sailor shirt tag exists? Wouldn't most posts tagged with serafuku be considered sailor shirts?
忍猫 said:
Is there a reason that the sailor shirt tag exists? Wouldn't most posts tagged with serafuku be considered sailor shirts?
I would assume it would be specifically for cases that are NOT either serafuku or sailor, i.e. when the sailor shirt is being worn with something else like a swimsuit.
kittey said:
What is pass even for? I checked a few posts and nothing looked like failure. When I read pass, I think of passport.
The images I looked at didn't appear to have anything in common. My best guess is that they were tagged by some sort of tag script accident. I'm tempted to simply nuke the tag unless someone can come up with a satisfactory reason for keeping it.
@Rignak Your input would be appreciated.
The gold wiki states it should only be used for coins, but it's currently being used for anything that looks to be made of gold - jewelry, treasure etc. Should the wiki's definition be changed or should the incorrectly tagged posts be gardened?
In my opinion, the former option seems more viable as people will only continue to mistag it even if somebody does clean up the posts.
iridescent_slime said:
The images I looked at didn't appear to have anything in common. My best guess is that they were tagged by some sort of tag script accident. I'm tempted to simply nuke the tag unless someone can come up with a satisfactory reason for keeping it.
@Rignak Your input would be appreciated.
Oh. I was indeed using a tag script back when we were trying to introduce the medium_breasts tag. It looks like it was adding 'pass' for the image that I skiped without adding the *_breasts tag...
Sorry about that.
Is looking past viewer the same as looking afar?
edit:wrong post
Is eyes in shadow the same as shaded face?